WebDuration first review round 1.8 months Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts 4.2 months Decision time immediate rejection 10 days Average number of review rounds 1.9 rounds … WebNature Communications is committed to providing an efficient service for both authors and readers. A streamlined peer-review system, together with the support of an Editorial Advisory Panel, allows a team of independent editors to …

Phys.org - Nature Communications

WebWhen performed correctly peer review helps improve the clarity, robustness and reproducibility of research. When peer reviewing, it is helpful to think from the point of view of three different groups of people: Authors. Try to review the manuscript as you would like others to review your work. When you point out problems in a manuscript, do so ... WebWhen Nature Communications launched in 2010, ... To mark this year’s Peer Review Week the Chief Editors of this Open Access journal wrote on the journal’s transparent peer review ... Furthermore, they represent a considerable amount of time and effort from all sides during the process. attack on titan season 1 episode 17

Nature Communications, Peer Review and Research Integrity

Web9 de abr. de 2024 · If your manuscript is sent to reviewers, please share with the community how many days the evaluated process took by editor's office (not include the evaluated … The following types of contribution to Nature Portfolio journals are peer-reviewed: Articles, Letters, Brief Communications, Matters Arising, Technical Reports, Analysis, Resources, Reviews, Perspectives and Insight articles. Correspondence and all forms of published correction may also be peer-reviewed at the discretion … Ver más We ask peer-reviewers to submit their reports via our secure online system by following the link provided in the editor's email. There is an … Ver más All submitted manuscripts are read by the editorial staff. To save time for authors and peer-reviewers, only those papers that seem most likely to meet our editorial criteria are sent for formal review. Those papers judged by the … Ver más In general, to be acceptable, a paper should represent an advance in understanding likely to influence thinking in the field, with strong … Ver más Reviewer selection is critical to the publication process, and we base our choice on many factors, including expertise, reputation, … Ver más WebI have a revised manuscript which I submitted to Nature Communications. The status of the manuscript says 'Reviewers Assigned' for about 24 days. What does it mean? Is it … fzlth6k -gbk1-0